Surface Roughness Modulation in S-PRG-Containing Resin Composites: Impact of Prebiotics and Probiotics

Document Type : Original articles

Authors

1 Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

2 Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. Departement of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

3 Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

10.21608/asdj.2024.325051.1578

Abstract

Aim: This study's objective was to investigate the impact of gut-friendly supplements ‎on the surface roughness of bulk-fill resin composites. ‎
Materials and methods: A hundred composite discs (10 mm × 2 mm) were prepared ‎from a bioactive surface pre-reacted glass (S-PRG) filled composite Beautifil Bulk ‎Restorative (BBR) and nanohybrid Tetric N-Ceram bulk (TNB) restorative resin-‎composite. Ten discs were examined per group after 24 hours without treatment ‎‎(baseline). Then, each group was split up into four subgroups (n=10) based on the ‎immersion media: distilled water (control), probiotics, prebiotics, and pro/prebiotic ‎media. Specimens were submerged for 10 minutes/day for 1 month. A 3D non-contact ‎optical Profilometer was utilized to measure surface roughness (Ra). Three subsequent ‎measurements in each specimen were taken to calculate the mean surface roughness ‎values. Data were calculated and statistically analyzed using Two-way ANOVA ‎followed by Tuckey’s post hoc test (P ≤ 0.05). ‎
Results: The results showed that the supplements-immersed surfaces of all tested ‎materials were roughest. There was a statistically significant difference between TNB ‎and BBR immersed in prebiotic and baseline at p=0.003 and p=0.022, respectively. The ‎BBR specimens immersed in prebiotic solution had the highest surface roughness value ‎‎(10.57 ± 0.90 µm). ‎
Conclusion: The S-PRG and nanohybrid composite resins' surface roughness may be ‎adversely affected by dietary supplements that are gut-friendly. BBR composite resin ‎was the one that suffered the most damage in surface roughness analysis after storage in ‎the prebiotics solution.‎

Keywords

Main Subjects